Automatic package signing using something like pkgsign.įollow our roadmap for development progress.CIDR whitelists for both read-only - entitlement - and read-write - API key - tokens.npm star to star and unstar package viewing stars.One-time passwords (OTP) or multi-actor authentication in the user login workflow.nodemodulesglobal npm config set prefixHOME/. Parsing of dependencies from the npm package and presenting them in the Cloudsmith UI. Any project that uses Node.js needs to have a package.json file that is known as a.Search results from upstream repositories are not blended into results only Cloudsmith results are shown. Changes stream to implement followers webhooks are a functional alternative.Īdditionally, any search terms used are not passed to upstream repositories and are handled by Cloudsmith.Creating tokens via npm token use the cloudsmith-cli or UI instead.Viewing and changing collaborators of packages via 'npm owner'.npm access and visibility packages follow repository visibility.Profile, user, team or org commands use the cloudsmith-cli instead.Unless otherwise specified we'll be working on removing these limitations in a near-future release.Ĭloudsmith is unlikely to support the following (out-of-scope): If uploading using the cloudsmith-cli, then the absolute maximum size per-package file limit will be the standard 5GiB. The maximum size per-package file is currently limited to 100MiB (100 megabytes), but only when utilising the native npm-cli for publishing.What I’m asking is, how can I be asked to code in a version like 17? If my project sits and does occasional builds for years, going forward - if I forget that I did this workaround - then I’m not running latest stuff, I’m not gaining the value of auto-updating, auto-dependencies, the slickness of Docker images etc.The Cloudsmith npm registry implementation currently has the following limitations: Now this - Is this where I could improve things by not referring to “development” but “production”? The “stable” does raise questions about Node.js v18: Is someone going to fix something? It seems unfortunate that (for me) it is not stable, because the Node or Linux people did an “intentional” breaking change.

travis.yml for a build, and obviously I tried to keep it as generic and minimalist as possible. Hi, can someone describe this more, in terms of:Ĭause → effect → what happens over time → what should Travis end user do?

Npm config set for project